ASICS GT 1000 5 and ASICS GT 2000 5 come from the same category of mid-priced stability running shoes for pronating runners. They’re both meant to give a moderate amount of stability, support, and cushioning for long-distance runs.

Don’t get confused by the name of the GT 2000 5 – it’s not only the 5th year of this line’s existence. The concept of this runner took after the legendary GT 2160, and this series has been growing and developing since 1993.

As for the GT 1000 5, it’s a more affordable version of the GT 2000 5. They don’t differ in terms of comfort, stability, cushioning, and longevity dramatically; one of their most distinctive features is the material used for the midsole, upper, and outsole.

Starving for more detail? Scroll down as our team has been working hard to detect every single difference and fairly compare ASICS GT 1000 5 and 2000 5.

General Specs

Feature ASICS GT 1000 5 ASICS GT 2000 5
Runner Type Neutral, overpronator Overpronator
Best Used On Road Road
Best Used For Daily running, long runs (half and full marathons) Daily running, long runs (half and full marathons)
Midsole Triple-density compression molded EVA foam:  1 main layer and 2 layers of GEL cushioning under the heel. Triple-density compression molded EVA foam: soft top layer, responsive bottom layer, and GEL middle layer (in the heel and forefoot).
Upper Engineered mesh, stitched-on overlays. Air mesh, no-sew overlays, plastic heel counter.
Midsole drop 10 mm 10 mm
Size Men’s – 6.0 – 15.0

Women’s – 5.0 – 13.0

Men’s – 6.0 – 12.5

Women’s – 5.0 – 13.0

Price 60$ 80$
Estimated Lifespan Up to 1000 miles Up to 1000 miles
Release Date October 2016 March 2016

ASICS GT 1000 5 vs 2000 5: Key Features

Feature ASICS GT 1000 5 ASICS GT 2000 5
Fit Fit a bit stiff due to a large amount of forefoot cushioning – benefits stability.

Has a roomy toe box, but the 2E and 4E widths fit a bit narrow.

Glove-like fit in the midfoot and heel areas.

The break-in period is required.

Fit a bit stiff due to a large amount of forefoot cushioning – benefits stability.

Has a roomy toe box.

Wraparound fit in the midfoot and heel areas.

The break-in period is required.

Stability Similarly high level of stability is offered by the ASICS GT 1000 5 and the ASICS GT 2000 5, according to running shoe lab tests.
Support Offers a good amount of support where overpronators need it

Highly supportive stitched-on overlays compensate the absence of external heel counter.

Offers a good amount of support where overpronators need it.

Less supportive no-sew overlays.

Sturdy external heel counter provides extra support behind the heel.

Responsiveness Rearfoot and forefoot GEL technology attenuates shock from the impact.

SpevaFoam midsole makes the bounce back better, besides it’s lightweight and durable.

Rearfoot and forefoot GEL technology attenuates shock from the impact.

FluidRide midsole offers the perfect lightweight and durable combination of bounce back and cushioning properties.

Gender-specific cushioning system.

Performance ASICS GT-1000 5 is a basic running shoe able to give you stability, responsive ride, comfort, and reliability without frills. ASICS GT-2000 5 works great, offering a blend of the well-cushioned run, supportive ride, proper arch support, and security mile after mile.
Special Technologies Impact Guidance System enhances the foot’s natural gait from heel strike to toe-off.

Rearfoot and Forefoot GEL Cushioning attenuates shock during impact and toe-off phases, allowing for smooth gait cycle and multidirectional movement.

Guidance Line Technology is a vertical flex groove that decouples the tooling along the line of progression for enhanced gait efficiency.

Guidance Trusstic Technology integrates Guidance Line construction for enhanced gait efficiency and provides midfoot structural integrity.

SpEVA Foam Midsole Material is lightweight and durable foam for improved bounce back characteristics.

DuoMax Support System is a dual density midsole system positioned to enhance support and stability.

Impact Guidance System enhances the foot’s natural gait from heel strike to toe-off.

Rearfoot and Forefoot GEL Cushioning attenuates shock during impact and toe-off phases, allowing for smooth gait cycle and multidirectional movement.

Guidance Line Technology is a vertical flex groove that decouples the tooling along the line of progression for enhanced gait efficiency.

Guidance Trusstic Technology integrates Guidance Line construction for enhanced gait efficiency and provides midfoot structural integrity.

FluidRide Midsole Material has great cushioning and bounce-back properties, it is lightweight and durable.

Dynamic DuoMax Support System is the evolution of DuoMax system. It enhances stability and support, with reduced weight and increased platform support.

Heel Clutching System provides improved support and heel fitting environment.

Discrete Eyelets disperse lace tension for a customized fitting environment and enhanced upper comfort.

Removable ComforDry Sockliner invests into cushioning and moisture wicking abilities of the shoe.

Size ASICS GT 1000 5 comes in standard shoe sizes in medium and wide widths for men and women. Also, there are extra wide models in several colorways for men.

Men: D, 2E, 4E; women: B, D.

Despite the company positions the GT 1000 5 as a true-to-size model, most runners found it not true to size (runs a half size smaller).

ASICS GT 2000 5 comes in standard shoe sizes in narrow, medium, wide, and extra wide widths both for men and women.

Men: B, D, 2E, 4E; women: 2A, B, D, 2E.

Despite the company positions the GT 2000 5 as a true-to-size model, most runners found it not true to size (runs a half size smaller).

Weight Women’s – 249g

Men’s – 295g

Women’s – 252g

Men’s – 312g


  1. Design

asics 1000 vs 2000 Design 2

asics 1000 vs 2000 Design 1

The external design of both ASICS GT 100 5 and GT 2000 5 is completely aimed to provide overpronating runners with maximum support and comfort, so it can’t be described as distinctive or visually-appealing. It’s simple and classic, however represented in a rather wide choice of colorways.

1.1 The Upper

Despite the construction is similar, the mesh used on the upper of the GT 1000 5 and GT 2000 5 differs: the first shoe’s upper material has such a structure that reduces the need of extra overlays, thus there are not any on its toe box (unlike in the ASICS GT 2000 5). Also, the GT 2000 5 has a visible external heel counter.

While the GT 2000 5 boasts with new no-sew overlays that look so sleek, the GT 1000 5 sticks to traditional stitched-on overlays, which are more supportive and durable but their look is less stylish.

Fairly soft and breathable mesh, traditional lace-up closure, moderately padded tongue and collar present in both models.

1.2 The Outsole

asics 1000 vs 2000 Outsole 2

asics 1000 vs 2000 Outsole 1

Construction and layout of both outsoles look quite the same: with the DuraSponge blown rubber in critical areas for good traction and durability, and vertical Guidance Line for a better transition from landing to take off, both models offer the proper amount of traction, comfort, and flexibility.

1.3 The Insole

The interior of ASICS GT 1000 5 and 2000 5 has adequate volume to accommodate different kinds of orthotics, however, they feature standard responsive foam and ConforDry insoles respectively.

1.4 The Midsole

asics 1000 vs 2000 Midsole 2

asics 1000 vs 2000 Midsole 1

The midsoles of the ASICS GT 1000 5 and GT 2000 5 partially differ in construction and materials used. The only common feature is the visible forefoot and rearfoot GEL cushioning pads.

Talking about the main foam unit, in the GT 1000 5, you’ll find standard SpEVA foam, which features lightweight, durability, and high responsiveness. The cushioning technology of the GT 2000 5 is more updated: it’s gender-specific, exclusive SpEVA stands on top of the Solyte foam, and the FluidRide technology improves the shock attenuation too.

1.5 Heel-to-toe drop

10 mm heel-to-toe drop is another common feature of the ASICS GT 1000 5 and 2000 5. It’s optimal to guarantee smooth and comfy transition through the gait cycle.

  1. Breathability

asics 1000 vs 2000 Breathability 2

asics 1000 vs 2000 Breathability 1

Highly-breathable mesh material characterizes the upper of both models. The lining and insoles also don’t prevent free air circulation, thus a proper moisture management and odor-free running experience are guaranteed whatever the race length.

  1. Cushioning

Talking about the cushioning, the forefoot cushioning that can be characterized as the most distinctive in both models; it lies way above the average amount expected from a stability running shoe. As for the heel cushioning, it’s equally less than the amount of forefoot cushioning in both shoes too.

However, the ASICS GT 2000 5 wins a point thanks to its gender-specific cushioning system, which accommodates specific needs of males and females.

  1. Comfort

Both lines have been updated a lot to be maximally comfortable for overpronating runners (the toe box was given more room, while fit in the midfoot and heel is left adjustable and glove-like), yet they need a short break-in period anyway.

Nonetheless, ASICS GT 2000 5 is considered to be a step forward in terms of ability to reduce irritation without sacrificing support at the same time.

  1. Flexibility

The deep vertical flex groove enhances transitions and helps with the flexibility of both GT 1000 5 and 2000 5. Upper construction also allows for free multidirectional movement in these running shoes.

  1. Safety & Support

While the ASICS GT-1000 5 uses good old stitched-on overlays throughout the upper, the GT 2000 5 reduces the area covered with new no-sew overlays and adds a supportive external heel counter.

Thus, both models offer a similar amount of safety and support, in spite of their small upper construction differences.

  1. Durability

High-quality materials used for the upper, midsole, and rubber under the ASICS GT 2000 5 and GT 1000 5 benefits the durability of these running shoes, making them incredibly durable. The company guarantees up to 1000 miles of safe running experience in these shoes, while some runners did up to 2500-3000 miles in these legendary stability running shoes from ASICS.

Bottom Line

Summing up, if you’re looking for a high-quality stability running shoes for overpronating feet ASICS GT 1000 5 and 2000 5 are both great picks for you. Their construction and external design are very similar with several non-distinctive differences:

  1. The GT 1000 5 is a good pick for both overpronators and neutral runners, while the GT 2000 5 is meant for overpronating athletes only
  2. The GT 1000 5 is a more budget-friendly option, however, the price difference is not crucial.
  3. ASICS GT 1000 5 is more lightweight than the GT 2000 5.
  4. ASICS GT 2000 5 offers gender-specific fit thanks to it’s a bit more updated cushioning technology.
  5. The support and stability mechanisms differ in these two models; however, the final result is quite the same.
  6. ASICS GT 2000 5 has a more stylish external design due to replacement stitched-on overlays with no-sew overlays.

We’ve been debating a lot before giving our final verdict, as it’s really a tough choice, but most of our team opts for ASICS GT 2000 5. Yet, no one can deny the fact the ASICS GT 1000 5 is a really great shoe for long-distance running too.

You may also like:
Brooks Ghost 10 vs Glycerin 15 Review
Nike Kaishi 2.0 SE VS Roshe 2 Flyknit V2
Ultra Boost 1.0 vs 2.0 vs 3.0 – Reviewed and Tested